Which will have the most impact?

Tap a card below to make your choice.
Tap ‘Read more’ to explore a solution.

Try another one

Electric Vehicles

Transport

Electric vehicles are the cars of the future. If powered by solar energy, their carbon dioxide emissions drop by 95 percent compared to gasoline-powered vehicles.

Read more

Rank and results by 2050 #26

Electric Vehicles

Reduced CO2: 11 gigatons
Net cost (Billions US$): $14,148.00
Net operational savings: $9,726.40 billion
What do these numbers mean?

TOTAL CO2-EQ REDUCTION (GT)

Total CO2-equivalent reduction in atmospheric greenhouse gases by 2050 (gigatons)

NET COST (billions US $)

Net cost to implement

SAVINGS (billions US $)

Net savings by 2050

Impact:

In 2014, 305,000 EVs were sold. If EV ownership rises to 16 percent of total passenger miles by 2050, 10.8 gigatons of carbon dioxide from fuel combustion could be avoided. Our analysis accounts for emissions from electricity generation and higher emissions of producing EVs compared to internal-combustion cars. We include slightly declining EV prices, expected due to declining battery costs.

Vs

Temperate Forests

Land Use

Ninety-nine percent of temperate forests have been altered in some way — timbered, converted to agriculture, disrupted by development. Restoring them sequesters carbon and revives ecosystems.

Read more

Rank and results by 2050 #12

Temperate Forests

Reduced CO2: 23 gigatons
What do these numbers mean?

TOTAL CO2-EQ REDUCTION (GT)

Total CO2-equivalent reduction in atmospheric greenhouse gases by 2050 (gigatons)

NET COST (billions US $)

Net cost to implement

SAVINGS (billions US $)

Net savings by 2050

Impact:

We project that temperate forest restoration will expand to an additional 235 million acres through natural regeneration. Though this is much lower than the available area for tropical forest restoration, it still sequesters 22.6 gigatons of carbon dioxide by 2050.

Start again