Which will have the most impact?

Tap a card below to make your choice.
Tap ‘Read more’ to explore a solution.

Try another one

Wind Turbines (Onshore)

Electricity Generation

Proliferation of turbines, dropping costs, and heightened performance mean onshore wind farms are at the forefront of initiatives to address global warming.

Read more

Rank and results by 2050 #2

Wind Turbines (Onshore)

Reduced CO2: 85 gigatons
Net cost (Billions US$): $1,225.37
Net operational savings: $7,425.00 billion
What do these numbers mean?

TOTAL CO2-EQ REDUCTION (GT)

Total CO2-equivalent reduction in atmospheric greenhouse gases by 2050 (gigatons)

NET COST (billions US $)

Net cost to implement

SAVINGS (billions US $)

Net savings by 2050

Impact:

An increase in onshore wind from 3 to 4 percent of world electricity use to 21.6 percent by 2050 could reduce emissions by 84.6 gigatons of carbon dioxide. At a cost of $1.23 trillion, wind turbines can deliver net savings of $7.4 trillion over three decades of operation. These are conservative estimates, however. Costs are falling annually and new technological improvements are already being installed, increasing capacity to generate more electricity at the same or lower cost.

Vs

Wave and Tidal

Electricity Generation

Wave - and tidal - energy systems harness natural oceanic flows — among the most powerful and constant dynamics on earth — to generate electricity.

Read more

Rank and results by 2050 #29

Wave and Tidal

Reduced CO2: 9 gigatons
Net cost (Billions US$): $411.84
Net operational savings: $-1,004.70 billion
What do these numbers mean?

TOTAL CO2-EQ REDUCTION (GT)

Total CO2-equivalent reduction in atmospheric greenhouse gases by 2050 (gigatons)

NET COST (billions US $)

Net cost to implement

SAVINGS (billions US $)

Net savings by 2050

Impact:

There are not many projections of wave and tidal energy to 2050. Building on those few, we estimate that wave and tidal energy can grow from .0004 percent of global electricity production to .28 percent by 2050. The result: reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 9.2 gigatons over thirty years. Cost to implement would be $412 billion, with net losses of $1 trillion over three decades, but the investment would pave the way for longer-term expansion and emissions reductions.

Start again