Which will have the most impact?

Tap a card below to make your choice.
Tap ‘Read more’ to explore a solution.

Try another one

Solar Water

Electricity Generation

Water heating is a major energy use. Solar water heaters use the sun's radiation and can reduce that energy consumption by 50 to 70 percent.

Read more

Rank and results by 2050 #41

Solar Water

Reduced CO2: 6 gigatons
Net cost (Billions US$): $2.99
Net operational savings: $773.65 billion
What do these numbers mean?

TOTAL CO2-EQ REDUCTION (GT)

Total CO2-equivalent reduction in atmospheric greenhouse gases by 2050 (gigatons)

NET COST (billions US $)

Net cost to implement

SAVINGS (billions US $)

Net savings by 2050

Impact:

If solar water heating grows from 5.5 percent of the addressable market to 25 percent, the technology can deliver emissions reductions of 6.1 gigatons of carbon dioxide and save households $774 billion in energy costs by 2050. In our calculations of up-front costs, we assume solar water heaters supplement and do not replace electric and gas boilers.

Vs

Energy Storage (Utilities)

Electricity Generation

Energy storage — daily, multiday, and longer-term or seasonal — is vital to reduce emissions from polluting “peaker” plants and accommodate the shift to variable renewables.

Read more

Rank and results by 2050 #77

Energy Storage (Utilities)

What do these numbers mean?

TOTAL CO2-EQ REDUCTION (GT)

Total CO2-equivalent reduction in atmospheric greenhouse gases by 2050 (gigatons)

NET COST (billions US $)

Net cost to implement

SAVINGS (billions US $)

Net savings by 2050

Impact:

Taken on its own, the production of energy storage does not reduce emissions; instead, energy storage enables adoption of wind and solar energy. No carbon impact numbers are included above in order to prevent double counting with the variable renewable energy solutions themselves. As with other forms of grid flexibility, the costs and total growth are not modeled directly.

Start again